Fall Arrest Anchorage – Your Life Depends on Your Choice


Anchorage Guidance

 

Chemical, expansion, ground, temporary, permanent are all types of fall arrest anchor, but which one would you choose and on what basis would you make that choice? It can be a daunting task especially if there are external pressures from clients, principal contractors, designers and even your employees to get the project completed on time.

 

There are a few simple rules that should make life easier when choosing the correct type of fall arrest anchor.

 

Anchorages can be broken down into four main types; the first thing you have to do is consider the intermediate attachment equipment you will be using. Intermediate attachment is an all encompassing phrase used to describe the safety equipment that connects the user and their harness to the anchorage point.

 

It is this choice of equipment that needs to be taken into account as certain intermediate attachments require a higher standard of anchorage testing and certification. And subsequently your method statements and risk assessments will need to be more detailed and complex.

 

The main types:

 

Fall Arrest Temporary Anchors & Locations

This is a type of anchor that is used with Fall Arrest equipment, for example shock absorbing lanyards and inertia reels. “Temporary” means you can use it for that moment in time, it is temporary for you to use but it may be permanent to the structure. The most important aspect in choosing this type is that it has to withstand a dynamic force of 12kN which gives a safety factor of 2:1 as fall arrest equipment has to limit the arrest forces to 6kN. This type of anchor might include the steel structure of a building, such as a structural column or a girder. Selecting the appropriate suitability of anchors is usually a decision which is made based on experience and competence. However if there is any doubt you should consult your architects, chartered engineers, or other such competent person ensuring that you have written documentation to support this decision.

Anchor points should be chosen in consideration of the free fall distance required should the user fall. Where possible the fall arrest anchor should be above head height to minimise the fall distance required. Consideration should also be given when choosing the anchor location as to avoid the possibility of creating a pendulum swing fall.

 

Fall Arrest Permanent Anchors & Locations

This type of anchor is used with Fall Arrest equipment, as mentioned above. “Permanent” means an anchor that is designed to be nothing else but an anchor for fall arrest equipment; this includes any elements or components which are incorporated into the anchor point. For example, eye bolts, permanently installed wire or rail systems and dead weight anchors. The most important aspect of permanent anchors is that they must be installed, tested and certified to BS EN 795 by trained and competent people. That certificate must be attached to the permanent anchor and be legible. It is recommended that for class A1 anchors – e.g. eye bolts – that these are installed by a qualified competent person. Further advice on installation and periodic proof loading of class A1 anchor devices conforming to BS EN 795, which includes anchor devices designed to be secured to vertical, horizontal and inclined surfaces, e.g. walls, columns, and lintels can be found in BS7883. Also included in BS EN 795 are dead weight anchors – class E, anchors for use with horizontal flexible life lines – class – C, and slings – class

  • Deadweight and counterbalance anchor systems

Consideration needs to be given to the cantilever and frictional effects of this type of anchor. It is important that attention is given to wet or icy conditions as this can significantly affect the frictional performance of the anchor. BS 8437:2005 recommends that the anchor should be checked ensuring that it does not move when subjected to a load of four times that which will be applied in a work positioning situation, it further says that users should also consider the possibility of rescue, which might involve the weight of two persons.

  • Permanent horizontal flexible anchor lifeline

When installing a horizontal flexible anchor lifeline special consideration needs to be given to the deflection of the line when under fall arrest load, and particular attention needs to be given to the position of the anchor line supports when assessing the required free space below the user in case of a fall. Maximum distance between anchors, and the number of operatives attached to the anchor line must be strictly in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions.

  • Anchor Slings

Anchor slings can be made of textiles, steel wire rope, or chain. Textile anchor slings should have a minimum breaking strength of 22kN and the minimum strength of anchor slings made from wire rope or chain should be 15kN. Due to the weakening effect of looping anchor slings or lanyards through themselves – a miss configuration known as larks footing or choking – should be avoided, unless they are specifically designed to allow this, for example by provision of special loops along their length, or designed to a higher rating to make an allowance for the miss configuration e.g. wire slings rated to 24 kN or higher.

 

Adjustable Restraint Anchors

Restraint is a system of working that allows an operative to reach the leading edge or fall hazard and no further – if used correctly, thus preventing them from falling. Adjustable restraint allows the operative to set the restraint system to suit the task at that moment in time.

This is done by setting the distance from the anchor point to the fall hazard using a rope grab cam device which fixes the correct length of rope taking into account the length of connectors etc. This prevents the user going beyond the point at which they could fall. it’s “>It’s an ideal way of working for the roofing industry as the fall hazard changes almost on a minute by minute basis.

The anchor point for adjustable restraint must be able to with stand a dynamic force of 12kN because adjustable restraints must have a fall arrest back-up (EN353-2), in the event of the system being misused. To reduce the likelihood of this type of system being misused it is recommended that all personnel who use adjustable restraint systems receive competent training and certification.

 

Fixed Length Restraint Anchors

Just as for adjustable restraint systems, a fixed length restraint lanyard allows the operative to reach the edge of a fall hazard but no further and so prevents them from falling. The system is a fixed length and therefore the anchor only has to be able to withstand 3 times the body weight of the user, this is in case the operative trips – or for some reason runs at the open edge!! Where several users are connected to the same anchor point it’s recommended that at least three times the combined body weight of the users is used.

Working in fixed restraint prevents the operative falling and so removes some of the fall related issues, such as suspension trauma, fall height clearance etc.

If misused in such away as to allow a user to fall the consequences can result in serious injury or death.

 

Conclusion

The selection and positioning of anchors is a critical element of working at height. Life and death hangs on the choice, and it goes without question that they should be utterly reliable and have an adequate margin of strength to be able to withstand the dynamic and static forces that could be applied to them in service. Choosing the correct anchor should be done on a risk assessment matrix basis and be selected using the experience and knowledge of a competent person; if there is any doubt, a suitably qualified person should be used to certify the integrity of the anchor selection.

 

Leading Edge Safety provides courses which train delegates – enabling them to gain a recognised competency – to work at height, including the selection of suitable anchors.

 

Falls from height are one of the leading causes of death and serious injury in the work place, with a high personal cost to families and the subsequent financial cost to businesses.
Falls from height are one of the leading causes of death and serious injury in the work place, with a high personal cost to families and the subsequent financial cost to businesses.

 

With more than 50 years of experience in technical <a href=”http://www.leadingedgesafety.co.uk” >height safety</a> training and products, we have determined not only to provide the best fall protection and height safety training possible, but to also continuously develop new ideas, further our technological expertise, understand and implement new techniques and to repeatedly set higher standards of safe<a href=”http://www.leadingedgesafety.co.uk” > working at height.</a>

Popularity: 24% [?]

Comments are closed.

Guidance Podcasts
Harness Articles
At Height Training
  • HSE publications translated – Information and advice in world languages
    HSE welcomes people of all nationalities and ethnic backgrounds to its web site. If you are looking for information, help or guidance a number of publications have been translated into languages other than English. HSE publications translated – Information and advice in world languages […]
  • Quarry firm fined after worker plunge in 30-tonne wheel loader
    A quarry operator was today fined £30,000 after a 30-tonne wheel loader vehicle overturned and slid almost 16ft down a sand stockpile. Humberside Aggregates and Excavations Ltd, of Newport Road, North Cave, East Yorkshire, was also ordered to pay £10,590 in costs after pleading guilty to three separate breaches of Quarries Regulations 1999 in the prosecution […]
  • HSE targets ageing installations with new offshore inspection programme
    A new inspection programme of offshore oil and gas installations on the UK continental shelf is underway to ensure that ageing infrastructure does not adversely affect safety. After 40 years of oil and gas production in the UK sector of the North Sea, more than half of fixed platforms have exceeded their original design life or [...] […]
  • RR819: A small survey of exposure to rubber process dust, rubber fume and N-nitrosamines
    This report was carried out in support of HSE’s FIT3 Disease Reduction Programme Cancer Project’s aim to develop a strategy to reduce the incidence of occupational cancer in Great Britain. RR819 – A small survey of exposure to rubber process dust, rubber fume and N-nitrosamines […]
  • Workyear 2010/2011: Inspection of premises using MbOCA and isocyanates in the manufacture of moulded polyurethane articles
    This SIM provides guidance to inspectors on exposure to MbOCA and isocyanates in the manufacture of moulded polyurethane articles. View SIM 03/2010/07 – Workyear 2010/2011: Inspection of premises using MbOCA and isocyanates in the manufacture of moulded polyurethane articles […]
  • Buncefield prosecution – HSE podcast July 2010
    In this episode: We talk to HSE’s Deputy Chief Executive, Kevin Myers, about the prosecution of five companies held responsible for the explosion at Buncefield Oil Storage Depot in 2005. Buncefield prosecution – HSE podcast July 2010 […]
  • FAQs – Do employers have to provide personal protective equipment?
    The relevant regulations are the Personal Protective Equipment at Work Regulations 1992. Regulation 4 states: Every employer shall ensure that suitable personal protective equipment is provided to his employees who may be exposed to a risk to their health or safety while at work. Listen to HSE’s Infoline answer this question […]
  • Publication of HSE Annual Report and Accounts 2009/10
    The Annual Report reports on delivery of the HSE Business Plan 2009/10 together with other key developments in the organisation during the year. The Accounts include operating costs, recognised gains and losses, cash flows and a statement of financial position for HSE at 31 March 2010. View the HSE Annual Report and Accounts 2009/10 […]
  • Advice on acceptance criteria for damaged passive fire protection coatings on offshore installations
    This SPC introduces Offshore Information Sheet 12/2007, which provides guidance for evaluating the condition of passive fire protective coatings found offshore, and prioritising any repair action required. Feedback on issues raised as a result of inspections would be welcomed by OSD3.2. This SPC replaces SPC/Tech/OSD/36, which has been withdrawn. Advice on a […]
  • Riser emergency shut down valve (ESDV) leakage assessment
    This document describes how HSE assesses the acceptability of riser emergency shutdown valve (ESDV) leakage rates. This SPC replaces SPC/Tech/OSD/26 which has been withdrawn. Riser emergency shut down valve (ESDV) leakage assessment – view this document in full […]
  • Good and best practice offshore – collection of examples
    OSD need to identify and collect examples of good and best practice from regulatory interventions offshore. This SPC advises how this will be done. Good and best practice offshore – collection of examples view this document in full […]
  • Focus on…Serious accident on spindle moulder
    A worker making glazing beads on a spindle moulder received serious injuries to his hand, including amputations, when it went into the cutters as a result of a kickback. There was no false fence, tunnel guard or power feed fitted, so all the cutter block was exposed. The injuries were made much worse as ‘old style’ [...] […]
  • Operational circulars on REACH. OC 253/11, OC 253/12 and OC 253/13
    OC 253/11 – REACH (Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals) – Guidance on the Regulation Read circular OC 253/11 OC 253/12 – Arrangements for the enforcement of REACH (Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals) Read circular OC 253/12 OC 253/13 – Guidance on the interaction between COSHH and REACH ( […]
  • Worker loses lower leg after paving machine crush
    A Somerset construction firm has today been fined £10,000 after a worker’s foot was crushed under a paving machine – and he had to have his lower leg amputated. HSE prosecuted John Wainwright & Co Ltd for its role in the incident on School Road, Monkton in Heathfield on 29 August 2008. View press release ‘Worker loses [...] […]
  • Construction company put workers at risk of falls
    A major construction company has been fined today for failing to properly protect its workers from falls at height on a site in South Wales. Gee Construction Ltd was the principal contractor on the site at Castlegate, Caerphilly when a HSE inspector visited on 22 October 2009. View press release ‘Construction company put workers at risk of [...] […]
  • Castle Bromwich firm fined after worker injured by robot
    A Birmingham automotive firm has been fined after one of its employees was struck by a manufacturing robot, leaving his voice box damaged and almost paralysing him down one side of his body. HSE prosecuted Castle Bromwich-based Dura Automotive Body and Glass Systems UK yesterday (Wednesday) and the company was fined £30,000 and ordered to pay [...] […]
  • Noise ebulletin – free news and updates
    Subscribe today, receive a free email detailing the latest news and developments on the noise website. Latest ebulletin: Noise Podcast, HSE’s Pete Lennon talks about tackling the risks from noise and vibration in the workplace. Noise ebulletin – free news and updates […]
  • RR818 – Follow up evaluation of HSE’s web based Work-Related Violence Toolkit
    This project is the second phase of the evaluation of the ‘Managing violence in licensed and retail premises’ toolkit. The toolkit is aimed at duty holders in licensed and retail premises and is also intended as a resource for Local Authority inspectors. The HSE was interested in collecting feedback about the toolkit from people who had [...] […]
  • FAQs – When do the CDM Regulations 2007 apply to a project?
    The Construction, Design and Management (CDM) 2007 Regulations apply to most common building, civil engineering and engineering construction work. You must notify HSE of the site if the construction work is expected to either last longer than 30 days or involve more than 500 person days of construction work. Listen to HSE’s Infoline answer this question […]
  • HSE Chair’s speech at NEBOSH Graduation
    HSE Chair Judith Hackitt’s speech at the National Examination Board in Occupational Safety and Health graduation, 28 June 2010 View transcript of HSE Chair’s speech at NEBOSH Graduation […]