Fall Arrest – The Correct Use of Shock Absorbing Lanyards


Shock Absorbing Lanyard Guidance

Falls from height are one of the leading causes of death and serious injury in the work place, with a high personal cost to families and the subsequent financial cost to businesses. It is incumbent upon employers to mitigate this by either designing out the fall hazard or by providing adequate restraint or fall arrest systems.

A personal fall prevention or arrest system comprises of three components:

  • An anchorage point
  • Body harness
  • Intermediate attachment – connecting (tethering) device between harness and anchor point

Non-Shock Absorbing Lanyards (restraint lanyards)
In a fall restraint system a lanyard connection is used between the anchor point and the body harness preventing the user from reaching the fall area. If a non-shock absorbing type of lanyard is used the utmost care must be taken that it is not possible for the user to gain access to a fall area. A non-shock absorbing lanyard must never be used to arrest a fall, as the arrest forces will be too high without an energy absorber to lower those forces.

Shock Absorbing Lanyards
Alternatively a personal fall arrest system protects the user should they fall, by arresting the fall. In this system the connecting lanyard bears the greater forces during a fall.

The strength of an anchor point can easily be identified with training, and the harness has its arrest forces distributed throughout the body and over many webbing components. A shock absorbing lanyard has only one strength member to withstand the fall forces and can easily be compromised by physical damage and incorrect storage. And yet it is not unusual for harnesses to be replaced more frequently by employers than the connecting lanyard.

Lanyards must be inspected frequently (see lanyard inspection later in this article)

There are two basic categories of shock absorbing lanyard, fixed length energy absorbing tear webbing lanyard, and adjustable length energy absorbing cam lanyard.

Fixed length – shock absorbing lanyards
This type of lanyard is usually a webbing or rope lanyard which includes a shock absorbing element made from specially woven inner webbing that smoothly tears, decelerating forces over a given length reducing the fall arrest forces to a level which is safe and avoids injury.

Pros: Low cost, lightweight, easily portable.
Cons: fixed length- providing limited reach, often needing frequent repositioning, easily damaged-becoming unsafe.

Fixed length shock absorbing lanyards are available in a variety of materials and choice is dependent upon the working environment and application. These materials are mostly: webbing (Nylon, and Polyester which has better chemical resistance than nylon), rope – which has better wear characteristics than webbing, and steel wire which has good abrasion and heat resistance properties but is dangerous around high voltage electrical hazards.

At leading edge we have a preference for rope shock absorbing lanyards, as we believe they have better wear and strength characteristics and are less vulnerable to damage if the fall is over a sharp edge.
If a webbing lanyard sustains a cut on its edge the strength of the lanyard is greatly reduced, often to the point of failure in the event of a fall.

Fall distance – it’s is not unusual for workers to greatly underestimate the clearance required when using fixed length shock absorbing lanyards. The shock absorbing element extends as it is deployed and decelerates. As a Guide when using 2M length lanyards the fall distance required (to provide adequate clearance to the fallen operative) is 5.2M when attached above head height, 5.75M when connected at shoulder height and 6.75M when attached at foot level. It is often difficult to judge the exact fall distance (even if it’s known) to be sure there is sufficient clearance should the operative fall.

Do’s and Don’ts - when using fixed length shock absorbing lanyards

  • Lanyard length must not exceed 2M including energy absorber and connectors, shorter lanyards should be used if possible
  • If the user needs to turn round under an anchor point a lanyard incorporating a swivel should be used to prevent the lanyard twisting.
  • Never tie a knot in a lanyard to make it shorter, it reduces the lanyard strength by 50%
  • Lanyards should not be connected together to increase the lanyard length, as this will lead to increased fall distances higher and excessive fall arrest forces on the user, anchor points and lanyard.

Adjustable Length – Shock Absorbing Lanyards
This type of lanyard developed by Leading Edge Supplies allows an operative to work in restraint or a work positioning system while providing back up fall arrest – should the user inadvertently misuse the equipment and put them within reach of the fall area.
The adjustable lanyard is available in lengths from 1M – 20M (with fall arrest back up) providing plenty of scope for movement within the work area.
The adjustable lanyard is a rope based system; it has a sliding cam fixed permanently on the rope in the correct direction of use. eli The cam’s profile is designed to automatically bite against the rope immediately the operator releases the trigger setting the position on the rope. This allows the operative to set the length of his lanyard to limit his travel and provide restraint up to the maximum of his work area. It can be easily be adjusted as work and space demands.
In the event of a fall the aluminium cam acts as an energy absorber, arresting the fall within a matter of inches (tested to EN353) and arrest forces under 6kN (typically 3kN). The short fall distance results in a limited fall where the casualty is often conscious and without significant injury, allowing a speedy rescue, which is now recognised as critical to the wellbeing of the casualty.

Pro’s and Con’s
Pros: Low cost, lightweight, easily portable, fall distance clearance is greatly reduced (a few inches), works in restraint and fall arrest, easy adjustment for length allows maximum flexibility, comfortable very little pressure on workers back- unlike Inertia Reels-and can be used in both horizontal and vertical positions.
Cons: requires instruction before use, can be damaged if subject to cutting or high temperature burning (can be specified with wire rope where this may be a possibility). If using with fixed anchorage point in restraint, can be subject to pendulum effect the same as self retracting lifelines (inertia reels). Leading Edge recommend using with a temporary horizontal lifeline to provent this.

Selection considerations
Attention needs to be given to the HSE hierarchy of protective measures given in the Work at Height Regulations 2005. The highest in the provision is work equipment which prevents a fall, e.g. designing out the fall possibility or personal work restraint systems. A lower provision is work equipment which minimises the consequences of a fall, e.g. personal fall protection systems.
The type of work being carried out and the environment in which the work is being done has a great bearing on the selection of the connecting lanyard. The presence of oil, grease, acids, dirt, electrical hazards, even moisture need to be taken into account as do abrasion or exposure to UV .

Inspection
Fall protection and restraint lanyards deteriorate with age and use, regardless of brand or type. The strength of the lanyard can easily be compromised be physical damage such as cuts, abrasion, wear and excessive exposure to dirt, dust, oil, grease, acid, moisture, UV and improper storage.
Leading Edge recommend that operatives and employers attend an inspection training course or receive inspection training as part of their working at height training enabling operatives and employers to inspect webbing, rope and wire lanyards including the metal hard-wear for the following:

  • Cuts
  • Abrasions
  • Broken stitching
  • Swelling
  • Unusual patterns
  • Fraying
  • Burns
  • Chemical damage
  • Weld Spatter
  • Discolouration
  • Deformed and damaged hardware including distortions, cracks, corrosion and pitted surfaces.
  • Workers are being killed and seriously injured by equipment which initially passed the required safety standards.
    Correct lanyard selection and use is a key component in both fall prevention and fall arrest and it is important to bear in mind that in these systems the connecting lanyard bears the greater forces during a fall.

    Leading Edge strongly recommends that both management and operatives receive training to assist them in making the correct choices when selecting and using lanyards.

    Falls from height are one of the leading causes of death and serious injury in the work place, with a high personal cost to families and the subsequent financial cost to businesses.
    With more than 50 years of experience in technical height safety training and products manufacture we have determined not only to provide the best fall protection and height safety training possible, but to also continuously develop new ideas, further our technological expertise, understand and implement new techniques and to repeatedly set higher standards of safe working at height.

    Work site projects and trades require workers to be trained to achieve a high standard of competence in order to work safely at height. In depth knowledge of the equipment and safety concerns can not only improve an operator’s confidence and efficiency but will also save lives and prevent serious injuries.

    Leading Edge height safety training courses are specifically designed for anyone whose job requires them to work at height and involves using the necessary safety equipment required to do this.

    For more information visit http://www.leadingedgesafety.co.uk

    Popularity: 29% [?]

    Comments are closed.

    Guidance Podcasts
    Harness Articles
    At Height Training
    • HSE publications translated – Information and advice in world languages
      HSE welcomes people of all nationalities and ethnic backgrounds to its web site. If you are looking for information, help or guidance a number of publications have been translated into languages other than English. HSE publications translated – Information and advice in world languages […]
    • Quarry firm fined after worker plunge in 30-tonne wheel loader
      A quarry operator was today fined £30,000 after a 30-tonne wheel loader vehicle overturned and slid almost 16ft down a sand stockpile. Humberside Aggregates and Excavations Ltd, of Newport Road, North Cave, East Yorkshire, was also ordered to pay £10,590 in costs after pleading guilty to three separate breaches of Quarries Regulations 1999 in the prosecution […]
    • HSE targets ageing installations with new offshore inspection programme
      A new inspection programme of offshore oil and gas installations on the UK continental shelf is underway to ensure that ageing infrastructure does not adversely affect safety. After 40 years of oil and gas production in the UK sector of the North Sea, more than half of fixed platforms have exceeded their original design life or [...] […]
    • RR819: A small survey of exposure to rubber process dust, rubber fume and N-nitrosamines
      This report was carried out in support of HSE’s FIT3 Disease Reduction Programme Cancer Project’s aim to develop a strategy to reduce the incidence of occupational cancer in Great Britain. RR819 – A small survey of exposure to rubber process dust, rubber fume and N-nitrosamines […]
    • Workyear 2010/2011: Inspection of premises using MbOCA and isocyanates in the manufacture of moulded polyurethane articles
      This SIM provides guidance to inspectors on exposure to MbOCA and isocyanates in the manufacture of moulded polyurethane articles. View SIM 03/2010/07 – Workyear 2010/2011: Inspection of premises using MbOCA and isocyanates in the manufacture of moulded polyurethane articles […]
    • Buncefield prosecution – HSE podcast July 2010
      In this episode: We talk to HSE’s Deputy Chief Executive, Kevin Myers, about the prosecution of five companies held responsible for the explosion at Buncefield Oil Storage Depot in 2005. Buncefield prosecution – HSE podcast July 2010 […]
    • FAQs – Do employers have to provide personal protective equipment?
      The relevant regulations are the Personal Protective Equipment at Work Regulations 1992. Regulation 4 states: Every employer shall ensure that suitable personal protective equipment is provided to his employees who may be exposed to a risk to their health or safety while at work. Listen to HSE’s Infoline answer this question […]
    • Publication of HSE Annual Report and Accounts 2009/10
      The Annual Report reports on delivery of the HSE Business Plan 2009/10 together with other key developments in the organisation during the year. The Accounts include operating costs, recognised gains and losses, cash flows and a statement of financial position for HSE at 31 March 2010. View the HSE Annual Report and Accounts 2009/10 […]
    • Advice on acceptance criteria for damaged passive fire protection coatings on offshore installations
      This SPC introduces Offshore Information Sheet 12/2007, which provides guidance for evaluating the condition of passive fire protective coatings found offshore, and prioritising any repair action required. Feedback on issues raised as a result of inspections would be welcomed by OSD3.2. This SPC replaces SPC/Tech/OSD/36, which has been withdrawn. Advice on a […]
    • Riser emergency shut down valve (ESDV) leakage assessment
      This document describes how HSE assesses the acceptability of riser emergency shutdown valve (ESDV) leakage rates. This SPC replaces SPC/Tech/OSD/26 which has been withdrawn. Riser emergency shut down valve (ESDV) leakage assessment – view this document in full […]
    • Good and best practice offshore – collection of examples
      OSD need to identify and collect examples of good and best practice from regulatory interventions offshore. This SPC advises how this will be done. Good and best practice offshore – collection of examples view this document in full […]
    • Focus on…Serious accident on spindle moulder
      A worker making glazing beads on a spindle moulder received serious injuries to his hand, including amputations, when it went into the cutters as a result of a kickback. There was no false fence, tunnel guard or power feed fitted, so all the cutter block was exposed. The injuries were made much worse as ‘old style’ [...] […]
    • Operational circulars on REACH. OC 253/11, OC 253/12 and OC 253/13
      OC 253/11 – REACH (Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals) – Guidance on the Regulation Read circular OC 253/11 OC 253/12 – Arrangements for the enforcement of REACH (Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals) Read circular OC 253/12 OC 253/13 – Guidance on the interaction between COSHH and REACH ( […]
    • Worker loses lower leg after paving machine crush
      A Somerset construction firm has today been fined £10,000 after a worker’s foot was crushed under a paving machine – and he had to have his lower leg amputated. HSE prosecuted John Wainwright & Co Ltd for its role in the incident on School Road, Monkton in Heathfield on 29 August 2008. View press release ‘Worker loses [...] […]
    • Construction company put workers at risk of falls
      A major construction company has been fined today for failing to properly protect its workers from falls at height on a site in South Wales. Gee Construction Ltd was the principal contractor on the site at Castlegate, Caerphilly when a HSE inspector visited on 22 October 2009. View press release ‘Construction company put workers at risk of [...] […]
    • Castle Bromwich firm fined after worker injured by robot
      A Birmingham automotive firm has been fined after one of its employees was struck by a manufacturing robot, leaving his voice box damaged and almost paralysing him down one side of his body. HSE prosecuted Castle Bromwich-based Dura Automotive Body and Glass Systems UK yesterday (Wednesday) and the company was fined £30,000 and ordered to pay [...] […]
    • Noise ebulletin – free news and updates
      Subscribe today, receive a free email detailing the latest news and developments on the noise website. Latest ebulletin: Noise Podcast, HSE’s Pete Lennon talks about tackling the risks from noise and vibration in the workplace. Noise ebulletin – free news and updates […]
    • RR818 – Follow up evaluation of HSE’s web based Work-Related Violence Toolkit
      This project is the second phase of the evaluation of the ‘Managing violence in licensed and retail premises’ toolkit. The toolkit is aimed at duty holders in licensed and retail premises and is also intended as a resource for Local Authority inspectors. The HSE was interested in collecting feedback about the toolkit from people who had [...] […]
    • FAQs – When do the CDM Regulations 2007 apply to a project?
      The Construction, Design and Management (CDM) 2007 Regulations apply to most common building, civil engineering and engineering construction work. You must notify HSE of the site if the construction work is expected to either last longer than 30 days or involve more than 500 person days of construction work. Listen to HSE’s Infoline answer this question […]
    • HSE Chair’s speech at NEBOSH Graduation
      HSE Chair Judith Hackitt’s speech at the National Examination Board in Occupational Safety and Health graduation, 28 June 2010 View transcript of HSE Chair’s speech at NEBOSH Graduation […]